MODEL PROFILE · 模型档案

JEV-35B-NVFP4

autotrust · JEV-35B-NVFP4

> [!IMPORTANT] > **Try AutoTrust/GuruSearch live (new, 11 October 2026).** A recommendation and search demo in which every ranking is a > calibrated System 1 decision, made in about half a second: > * **Recommendation:** the latest headlines from 6 news feeds, ranked by importance. > * **Search:** results from Google News, Bing News and Yahoo News re-ranked by relevance, side by side with the > search engines' own order, plus a short answer with citations. This repository is **autotrust/JEV-35B with its 10,240 routed expert MLPs (40 layers × 256 experts) quantized to NVFP4**. Everything else is the bf16 model unchanged: attention, linear attention, the shared expert, the routers, the vision tower, the MTP layer, the lm_head, the System 1 adapter, the decision head and the temperatures. Below the NVFP4 comparison, the rest of this card is the JEV-35B card; its tables are the bf16 results unless marked otherwise. * **Text: −0.57 on the Decision Index.** All five areas within 1.2 skill points of bf16 (Knowledge 0.422, Language 0.628, Retrieval 0.706, Tools 0.753, Arts 0.413); the largest per-benchmark changes are Home appliance simulator −5.7, CRUXEval −4.7 and GPQA +5.4. * **Images: −0.85 on the vision rebuild**, a small but real loss (paired bootstrap 95 % interval −1.5 to −0.2), mostly on CharXiv charts (−5.3). * **Robot arm: 13 of 20 scenes against 15 of 20.** Four scenes changed outcome (3 lost, 1 gained), within noise (sign test p = 0.63); every grasped cube still reached the tray (13/13). * **Speed:** the same latency as bf16 on one B200 for single requests; the gain is memory (one 32–48 GB GPU is enough). * **Games** (seed 0, one run each, noisy): 2048 largest tile 64 (bf16 32), Snake 5 food (bf16 11), Quick, Draw! 85.9 % on finished sketches (bf16 86.3 %), chess mate-in-one 45 % (bf16 47 %), Connect Four 1 win of 6 (bf16 0).

译文排队中,当前展示来源原文。

文本分析license:apache-2.0
上下文窗口来源未披露
输入 → 输出文本 → 文本
模型权重待核验
档案更新时间2026/11/2 19:17:09
OVERVIEW

模型介绍

> [!IMPORTANT] > **Try AutoTrust/GuruSearch live (new, 11 October 2026).** A recommendation and search demo in which every ranking is a > calibrated System 1 decision, made in about half a second: > * **Recommendation:** the latest headlines from 6 news feeds, ranked by importance. > * **Search:** results from Google News, Bing News and Yahoo News re-ranked by relevance, side by side with the > search engines' own order, plus a short answer with citations. This repository is **autotrust/JEV-35B with its 10,240 routed expert MLPs (40 layers × 256 experts) quantized to NVFP4**. Everything else is the bf16 model unchanged: attention, linear attention, the shared expert, the routers, the vision tower, the MTP layer, the lm_head, the System 1 adapter, the decision head and the temperatures. Below the NVFP4 comparison, the rest of this card is the JEV-35B card; its tables are the bf16 results unless marked otherwise. * **Text: −0.57 on the Decision Index.** All five areas within 1.2 skill points of bf16 (Knowledge 0.422, Language 0.628, Retrieval 0.706, Tools 0.753, Arts 0.413); the largest per-benchmark changes are Home appliance simulator −5.7, CRUXEval −4.7 and GPQA +5.4. * **Images: −0.85 on the vision rebuild**, a small but real loss (paired bootstrap 95 % interval −1.5 to −0.2), mostly on CharXiv charts (−5.3). * **Robot arm: 13 of 20 scenes against 15 of 20.** Four scenes changed outcome (3 lost, 1 gained), within noise (sign test p = 0.63); every grasped cube still reached the tray (13/13). * **Speed:** the same latency as bf16 on one B200 for single requests; the gain is memory (one 32–48 GB GPU is enough). * **Games** (seed 0, one run each, noisy): 2048 largest tile 64 (bf16 32), Snake 5 food (bf16 11), Quick, Draw! 85.9 % on finished sketches (bf16 86.3 %), chess mate-in-one 45 % (bf16 47 %), Connect Four 1 win of 6 (bf16 0).

主要特点

特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。

局限与注意事项

暂无足够来源支持具体缺点结论。请重点验证实际任务表现、时延、数据政策、许可与版本生命周期。

PRICING & COST

来源报价与费用分析

同一模型在不同渠道、地区和配置下可能采用不同价格。下表独立保留各渠道报价,不将渠道价格视为厂商官方统一价格。

来源 / 渠道输入输出计费单位采集时间
暂未取得可核验报价,请查阅来源渠道。

按月估算基础 Token 费用

—

预估不包含缓存优惠、阶梯定价、多模态附加费用、网络检索、税费及推理额外输出。

INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS

公开评测与运行配置

暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。

查看完整已收录榜单 →

常见问题

开放权重是否代表可以免费商用?

不一定。应核对具体版本许可证、商用门槛和使用政策。自部署还会产生算力和维护成本。

这些价格是实时结算价格吗?

不是实时结算价格,而是带采集时间的来源报价快照。请到对应渠道核对当前版本、区域、折扣和计费方式。

资料来源与可追溯记录

许可证:apache-2.0。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。