AI NEWS.ccAI正在发生 未来正在更新
THE NEXT THING, IN PERSPECTIVEIndependent AI news

The latest AI news, in focus.

Official announcements and industry reporting. Follow the timeline of AI.

In focusAgents & automation Models AI creation Research & methods

Today's news

News feed
AI NEWS × FOXAIFind your next step

From the latest news to tools that work for you.

Explore AI tools

Discover AI tools

Swipe to explore →
JAXModels & infrastructure

JAX is a Python numerical computing library designed for accelerators, specifically tailored for high-performance array computations and large-scale machine learning. It efficiently executes the same code across multiple hardware backends, including CPUs, GPUs, and TPUs.

AI DEVELOPMENT PLATFORM分类推荐榜首Pricing unverifiedView details Open DesignDesign & 3D

OpenDesign is an open-source design workspace that can connect to local programming agents, use built-in model keys, or leverage cloud-based models, enabling the creation and editing of prototypes, web pages, presentations, and graphics within a design system; local software is free, while model services incur fees.

AI design tools分类推荐榜首Free entry availableView details MemoAIMusic & audio

MemoAI is an AI-powered audio-to-text tool that supports localized processing, eliminating the need to upload data and ensuring privacy and security. It can efficiently transcribe YouTube videos, podcasts, and local audio/video files (such as MP4, MP3, AAC, M4A, etc.) into text, while offering core features like multilingual translation, speaker diarization, real-time subtitles, and floating notes—making it ideal for meeting minutes, interview transcription, content learning, and more.

AI AUDIO TOOL分类推荐榜首Pricing unverifiedView details EvoMapAgents & automation

EvoMap is an infrastructure designed for the reuse of AI agent experiences. It organizes reusable strategies and repair assets with validation records via the GEP protocol, offering market- and quality-based ranking to help different agents discover, evaluate, and inherit existing capabilities.

分类推荐榜首Pricing unverifiedView details AI ShortWriting & content

AIS ALERT MANAGEMENT AND SHARED PLATFORM, QUICK COMMAND FOR MULTIPLE SCENARIOS

AI HINT COMMAND分类推荐榜首Pricing unverifiedView details KiroCoding & development

Kiro is an AI engineering tool for developers that organizes requirements into specifications, architectures, and tasks, generates code via agents, and supports the entire workflow—from planning to code review—through property-based testing, execution memory, and integration with development tools.

AI programming tool分类推荐榜首Free entry availableView details Udacity AI学院Education & languages

Udacity AI Academy is the gateway to AI courses and learning paths, covering machine learning, deep learning, computer vision, natural language processing, and AI product management, with courses and project-based training available at both beginner and advanced levels.

AI learning website待评分 · 分类列表推荐Pricing unverifiedView details FinBusiness & support

CLIENT-ORIENTED AI SMART BODY。

Customer serviceSmartClient services待评分 · 分类列表推荐Pricing unverifiedView details 妙播Marketing & commerce

THE AI LIVE TELECOM SOLUTION FROM THE AD

待评分 · 分类列表推荐Pricing unverifiedView details My Glow Up AILife & personal

My Glow Up AI provides free analysis based on selfies, without requiring registration, and can generate hairstyle recommendations and beauty plans that suit you.

待评分 · 分类列表推荐Pricing unverifiedView details

AI, as it happens

1824 published stories
Research paper · 423 storiesClear filters ×
2026-11-11
Follow the timeline
13:00
aarXiv cs.AI·News

Agent Architecture Cost-Success Trade-offs: A Controlled Evaluation across Enterprise-Style SOPs

arXiv:2611.12953v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprises increasingly use large language model agents to execute standard operating procedures (SOPs): long, branching, tool-intensive workflows. Yet there is little controlled evidence for choosing among competing agentic architectures. Holding the model, tasks, and tools fixed and varying only the architecture, we compare four designs (a function-calling single agent, a skill-augmented agent, centralized multi-agent orchestration, and a triage swarm; eight arms) across 13 enterprise SOPs, and introduce a skill-definition quality rubric to build matched high and low-quality skill corpora. Three takeaways emerge. (1)~\textbf{There is no universal best architecture; the right choice is SOP-dependent.} On a given SOP, task success ranges from under $10\%$ on the hardest to near $100\%$ on the easiest; no architecture is statistically separable in aggregate, and added structure only plausibly pays off on complex, branching SOPs (a directional, not yet significant, trend). (2)~\textbf{Added architecture cost must be justified by a task-success gain.} Every coordinated arm (multi-agent or skill-augmented) spends $1.4$--$4.7\times$ the tokens and $2.6$--$5.8\times$ the latency of the single agent for gains that are usually small and rarely significant, making the single agent the efficient default; high-quality skills do lift success (to $73.1\%$ from $67.4\%$) while degraded skills fall below it. (3)~\textbf{Implementation quality outweighs the single- versus multi-agent choice.} A plausible multi-agent implementation loses to the single agent, yet a targeted redesign of it becomes the only arm to significantly beat the baseline ($75.6\%$ vs.\ $67.4\%$).

Model evaluations & benchmarksRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.AI·News

Auditable Human-Agent Teams for Autonomous X-ray Experimentation

arXiv:2611.12933v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Closed-loop autonomous experimentation can accelerate scientific discovery, but implementation effort limits accessibility. Agentic systems may lower this barrier, although sustained operation on physical instruments remains largely unexplored. Here, using coding-agent infrastructure grounded in validated scientific methods, we demonstrate autonomous synchrotron X-ray experiments on nanoparticle superlattices under evolving, human-defined objectives. Complete human-agent and agent-agent transcripts enable an audit that reconstructs decision provenance and characterizes the division of cognitive labor. Across three experiments, 61-67% of messages involved interpretation or judgment, while the share of methodological and scientific contributions increased from 46% in the setup-focused first experiment to 56-61% in later experiments. Provenance showed that 59-68% of error corrections involved multiple participants and that about half of all decisions incorporated the input of another participant. These results may guide design principles for multi-agent scientific systems and inform future agent harnesses, model training, and accessible autonomous experimentation.

Agent frameworksRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.CL·News

BioMem: Agentic Memory for Biomedical LLM Agents

arXiv:2611.13426v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated considerable potential in biomedical applications, while agentic memory systems have emerged as a promising approach to preserving and utilizing information across tasks and interactions. However, a fundamental question remains: how effectively and reliably do these systems retain, retrieve, update, and utilize biomedical information? In this study, we systematically investigate agentic memory in the biomedical domain, focusing on task effectiveness, retrieval quality, information fidelity, and long-term robustness. We evaluate five memory approaches across four LLMs in three representative settings: biomedical knowledge reasoning, clinical prediction, and long-term conversational memory. Our analyses reveal how memory construction, evidence relevance, and conversational history shape downstream biomedical performance, highlighting the distinct challenges of retrieving relevant information, preserving its fidelity, and effectively utilizing it for reasoning. Building on these findings, we introduce Hybrid Memory Retrieval and Utilization (HMRU), a training-free framework that jointly enhances evidence accessibility and task-aware utilization to improve biomedical reasoning and long-term conversational memory. HMRU achieves an average relative improvement of 8.6% across biomedical question-answering and conversational memory benchmarks, with additional gains in selected clinical prediction tasks. It further reduces conversational answer errors by 24.9% and closes 48.0% of the performance gap to full-context inference. Our findings provide a systematic characterization of biomedical agentic memory and practical insights into developing more effective and reliable memory-augmented LLM systems.

Model releases & updatesRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.LG·News

Branch-and-Commit for Frozen RL Agents: When and Where to Spend Test-Time Compute

arXiv:2611.13003v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning agents are often deployed with policies that cannot be retrained or modified. In digital environments whose states can be copied and resumed, an operator has another option: sample several continuations from the current state, evaluate them, and continue from the endpoint of the selected branch. We call this procedure branch-and-commit. We study when it improves return, what produces the improvement, and where its computational budget should be spent. Across four environments, two frozen policies, five continuation verifiers, and a model-free selection rule, we find that the benefit of branching depends on dispersion: the difference between the best candidate return and the mean candidate return. Branching provides no benefit in low-dispersion settings, while increasing return by 12.8% in our main Craftax-Medium setting. Most of this gain comes not from selecting better actions, but from selecting among different stochastic realizations of the same action. Several competent verifiers achieve similar episode returns, suggesting that verifier quality is not the main constraint at our operating budget. Instead, computation is better allocated to states where useful dispersion is likely. On held-out seeds, gating branching using predicted dispersion retains 69% of the improvement from uniform branching while using 48% as many branching calls. These results characterize when branch-and-commit is useful and clarify what its gains represent.

Reasoning methods & architectureRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.CV·News

Continuous Angular Control in Text-to-Image Generation via Geometric Token Encoding

arXiv:2611.13172v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Text-to-image diffusion models can render a photorealistic analog clock but cannot control the time it displays. Across four pretrained models, fewer than 1% of generated clocks place both hands within 6 degrees of the requested time; the models instead collapse onto visually dominant configurations such as the canonical 10:10 pose. The same failure appears when a specific fraction of a circular object is requested, where models return complete or conventionally sliced objects. We observe that these two failures share a geometric structure: both target quantities can be parameterized by angular variables. We introduce a geometric token encoding framework that conditions generation directly on these angles. Each angular component is encoded as a periodic sine-cosine feature and projected into a role-specific token embedding that is injected into the prompt before a frozen text encoder. To spatially ground these tokens without requiring localization input at inference, we introduce Stochastic Localization Relaxation (SLR), which stochastically relaxes attention supervision from component-level to object-level to unconstrained localization during training. For clocks, we additionally introduce a hand-swap preference objective that discourages assigning the correct angles to the wrong hand roles. On analog clocks our method reaches 63-78% Acc@6 degrees across evaluation methods, compared with below 1% for the baselines. On circular-fraction generation, it achieves 89.5% Acc@0.10, while maintaining 88.8% on unseen object categories and 84.9% on unseen target values, compared with roughly 20% for pretrained baselines.

Image generationRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.CV·News

Evidence-Grounded Iterative Reasoning for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Cystic Lung Diseases

arXiv:2611.12981v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Overlapping imaging manifestations complicate the differential diagnosis of Diffuse Cystic Lung Diseases (DCLDs), while limited annotated data constrain supervised model development. Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can integrate imaging and clinical information, but their diagnostic reasoning remains limited by incomplete volumetric perception and insufficient grounding in disease-specific evidence. We propose DCLDs-EIR, an evidence-grounded iterative reasoning framework coupling diagnostic hypothesis refinement with multimodal evidence acquisition and verification. Multiview renderings of predicted lung and cyst segmentations characterize global cyst distributions and initialize the differential diagnosis. Competing hypotheses guide axial CT inspection to identify local findings that, together with clinical context, inform retrieval from a disease-specific knowledge graph. Accumulated patient observations and retrieved knowledge are jointly assessed for diagnostic support and refutation to revise the diagnostic state. Updated hypotheses and unresolved distinctions guide subsequent inspection, forming a feedback loop between evidence acquisition and hypothesis verification. Multicenter evaluation demonstrates that DCLDs-EIR consistently improves diagnostic accuracy over baselines and enables traceable differential diagnosis through explicit links between diagnostic hypotheses, patient observations, and disease-specific knowledge.

M&A & IPOsRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.DC·News

ForeSpark: Joint Draft and Verification Budget Scheduling for Parallel Speculative Decoding

arXiv:2611.13442v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Parallel drafters accelerate LLM decoding by proposing a whole block of draft tokens in a single forward pass, making them attractive for LLM serving. Recent systems optimize goodput (i.e., accepted tokens per second) because rejected drafts steal compute from other requests. However, these systems control only how many tokens are verified, so every request still drafts a full block. At high serving load, we find that drafting consumes up to 40% of step time, of which a majority is discarded because it is never verified. Yet, draft-length control from autoregressive drafters does not carry over, because a parallel drafter commits to its length before its single pass. Moreover, draft and verification lengths are coupled across the batch, so they must be selected jointly for every request while keeping the decision computationally cheap at every step. In this paper, we propose work-conserving speculation (WCS), a design that jointly allocates draft and verification budgets per request in LLM serving, and present ForeSpark as its prototype. ForeSpark realizes WCS with (i) a context-aware pre-draft estimator that predicts acceptance for every candidate length from the target model's context features, (ii) a lightweight joint draft-verify scheduler that selects both lengths through a global sort, and (iii) a post-draft budget distribution that spends verification on the most promising tokens. Implemented on vLLM, ForeSpark improves throughput by up to 1.77x over the state-of-the-art DSpark and by 2.49x over autoregressive decoding at a matched per-request generation rate, without changing the output distribution. It also tolerates higher load, sustaining up to 1.51x the request rate of DSpark under latency service level objectives (SLOs).

Inference systems & deploymentRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.AI·News

From Questions to Decisions: Benchmarking How LLM Agents Acquire Decision-Relevant Information from Human Beings

arXiv:2611.13015v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents are increasingly asked to make plans for people, such as scheduling drivers or assigning nurses. However, people's requests are often incomplete, and the supporting information for decision-making may be outdated, requiring agents to ask for clarification. Existing benchmarks typically provide fully specified problems or rely on uncalibrated LLM-simulated users, leaving this ability insufficiently tested. We introduce Ask2Decide, a benchmark of 43 planning tasks that evaluates whether agents ask for missing information that matters for their decisions. An operator holds facts absent from the agent's request and records, and optimization solvers determine which facts change the optimal plan. We also include similarly worded facts that leave the optimal plan unchanged to test whether agents distinguish useful information from irrelevant details. We collect 79 interaction sessions from 19 participants and find that, after an incorrect plan, human replies omit the correcting fact far more often than replies from an uncalibrated simulated user (43% versus 7%). Using these interactions, we calibrate a simulated operator that more closely matches human reply patterns. Evaluating four frontier LLMs, we find that their initial plans are infeasible on 58-98% of tasks when information is missing, compared with 5-28% when all facts are provided upfront. Agents uncover facts that change the optimal plan only slightly more often than facts that leave it unchanged (39-52% versus 32-41%). These results show that obtaining decision-relevant information through interaction remains a major bottleneck for LLM planning. This is ongoing work and will be updated. The date of this version is shown on the first page.

M&A & IPOsRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.CV·News

Instance-preserving graded semantic reporting for surgical action triplets

arXiv:2611.13009v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Complete-or-reject reporting of surgical action triplets can discard a correctly identified instrument and action when the target is uncertain. We introduce instance-preserving graded semantic reporting, which separates instance selection from the choice of semantic detail. Each selected instance retains its predicted mask and labels while hierarchical correctness scores guide instrument (I), instrument-verb (IV), or complete instrument-verb-target (IVT) reporting. The utility-increment rule DELTA weighs the expected gain from finer reporting against its error cost. We compare three decision rules on 5,641 test frames from eight surgical videos using fixed predictions and scores. At the 10% development calibration target, DELTA retains correct partial reports for 80.0% of candidates rejected by a matched complete-or-reject baseline (5,329/6,662). Adding IV increases source-normalized weighted correct-report yield by 19.13 to 23.13 per 100 frames across all three rules relative to separately recalibrated I/IVT controls. Weighted reporting risk changes by -0.77 to +1.01 percentage points, with complete correct-triplet counts unchanged or reduced. Graded reporting makes partial surgical predictions available as localized descriptions, with an explicit trade-off between report utility and completeness.

Copyright, privacy & ethicsRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.LG·News

INTENT: Out-of-Sample, Out-of-Time, and Cold-Start Evaluation on User Event Sequences

arXiv:2611.13069v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Banks now train foundation models on ordered sequences of customer events such as transactions, app sessions, and authorizations. Deployed, such a model predicts forward in time, often for customers and merchants absent from training, yet each is evaluated on private data, so no two can be compared. Public benchmarks for such sequences rarely test a period the model has not seen; recommendation studies usually hold out each user's last events instead. We present INTENT (INTEraction, Novelty, and Transfer evaluation for next-action prediction), a public benchmark that scores a model in seven cells defined by whether the user, the period, and the target item appeared in training. An audit of 59 public dataset families retains five datasets; the most common defect is the lack of a calendar timestamp that orders events. No date lies within the time span of all five datasets, so each is split at its own cutoff, chosen by one rule fixed before any model is evaluated. Summed over the datasets, every cell holds at least 111,769 users. In reference results the cell determines the best model: a transformer leads on seen items after the cutoff but scores zero on new items, a variant that embeds item metadata helps mainly on MicroLens, and repeating the user's last item leads on new items in four of five datasets. This parameter-free control also shows that on three datasets most of the score lost after the cutoff reflects changed behavior rather than the model. The pipeline, the cutoff rule, and the per-cell user counts are publicly available.

Model evaluations & benchmarksRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.LG·News

Linear Probes to Bayesian Manifolds: Geometry of Arithmetic in Large Language Models

arXiv:2611.12998v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Linear probes are a standard method to study geometric structures, such as helices and circles, from the activations of large language models (LLMs), and such structure is often taken as evidence that the model computes with it. Probe accuracy alone cannot establish this, because it conflates four separate claims. These are (1) that the concept is decodable from the activations, (2) that they form a specific shape, (3) that the shape belongs to the probed concept rather than to a related concept the model also represents, and (4) that the output of the model depends on the shape. We call these claims decodability, shape, ownership, and causal use, and we test them separately with a four-stage Bayesian pipeline. Stage 2 compares candidate shapes and selects the best one only when its evidence passes a predefined threshold. Stage 3 removes a set of related concepts, specified in advance, and tests whether the shape is owned or inherited. Stage 4 intervenes on the shape to test whether the output of the model depends on it. We apply the pipeline to two-digit addition and multiplication in GPT-J 6B, Llama 3.1 8B, and Pythia 6.9B. Nearly every concept is decodable, but the decoded directions overlap substantially across concepts. Every strongly supported comparison selects a ribbon, which is a helix whose radius changes with the value, or a torus. Of 1,330 cells with an ownership verdict, 19% of shapes are owned and 81% are inherited. Owned and inherited shapes move the output about equally often. Intervening on the shape retains approximately 61% of the effect of intervening on the full probe while using at most five dimensions, against a median of nine for the probe. Our results indicate that a probe verdict alone overstates what a model computes with, and we propose that probe results be reported as verdicts on all four claims rather than as a single accuracy.

Model releases & updatesRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.CL·News

Measuring Definition Sensitivity in LLM Annotation of Social Science Concepts

arXiv:2611.13339v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In social science research, text annotation is a fundamental task that is traditionally a costly, hard-to-scale manual process. Researchers have used large language models (LLMs) to perform annotation by writing a definition of a concept into a prompt - a rule that determines whether a label should be attributed to a text depending on its content. However, concepts such as hate speech, fake news, and terrorism typically have several theoretically defensible competing definitions. It is also unknown whether the model actually applied the definition to provide the label or the label was based on the model's pretrained notion of the concept. To test this, we have the model annotate the same texts twice, each time with a different definition. We call the disagreement between the two sets of annotations definition sensitivity. As a control, we paraphrase one definition but leave its requirements unchanged - the disagreement between the annotations with the two wordings becomes the paraphrase floor. Across six concepts and three LLMs, a swap of competing definitions always changes more annotations, on average, than a paraphrase. This shows that the annotations depend on the prompted definition, so any set of annotations should be interpreted together with the definition that produced it. The LLM annotator's definition sensitivity and its paraphrase floor should both be reported in such work.

Model releases & updatesRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.CV·News

MICRO: A Surgery-Phase Retinal Image Rigid Registration Benchmark and One-Step Frequency-Structure Similarity Registration Learning

arXiv:2611.13045v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Precise multimodal retinal image rigid registration (MRIRG) is essential for aligning cross-modal vessel structures, offering critical guidance for ophthalmic surgery. Despite its significance, the advancement of MRIRG is hindered by the lack of publicly available multimodal retinal image rigid registration datasets spanning various ophthalmic surgery phases (e.g., preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative). To address this issue, we introduce the MICRO dataset, a large-scale MRIRG benchmark, comprising 1,365 cross-modal retinal image pairs with standardized annotations across all ophthalmic surgery phases. Moreover, existing deep registration methods achieve competitive MRIRG results via a two-step segmentation-then-detection framework, but segmentation quality heavily constrains their performance. We argue that this dependency stems from an implicit need for keypoint topology constraints, which have not been exploited for MRIRG through a one-step registration framework. Inspired by the above analysis, we propose a novel One-step Frequency-Structure Similarity Registration (OFS2Reg) learning framework for MRIRG that leverages the potential of cross-modal vessel structure similarities to construct keypoint topology constraints under a shared detection network. To be specific, OFS2Reg applies a well-designed frequency-guided structure preservation descriptor to construct coarse keypoint topology constraints in descriptors by highlighting significant vessel structures. Additionally, we develop a new cross-modal vessel structure similarity learning method that refines cross-modal keypoint topology constraints to precisely align pixel-level cross-modal vessel structures by leveraging cross-modal vessel structure similarity priors.

Model evaluations & benchmarksRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.LG·News

Multimodal Graph Learning: A Survey of Models, Benchmarks, and Frontiers

arXiv:2611.12990v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal attributed graphs (MAGs), in which nodes carry text, images, and other modalities while edges encode relations among entities, underlie e-commerce, social media, content platforms, and creative applications. Learning on MAGs has developed along two complementary lines: graph-centric methods redesign how modalities are fused, propagated, and connected within message passing, while foundation-model-centric methods pretrain transferable multimodal graph encoders or bring graph context into multimodal large language models for prediction and generation. In parallel, several benchmarks have appeared with different datasets and evaluation protocols. This survey takes an algorithm-centric and evaluation-grounded view of the field and makes three contributions. Modeling: we introduce a unified message-passing formulation and organize methods into five integration levels (feature, propagation, topology, learning, and foundation model), covering discriminative and graph-conditioned generative models; within this formulation we derive representative methods as special cases, compare their assumptions, expressiveness, and cost, and identify cross-modal sensitivity as a property that separates otherwise similar architectures. Datasets and evaluation: we review recent benchmarks, summarize their datasets and metrics, define model-independent descriptors (label homophily, average degree, clustering, and edge provenance), and map each evaluation protocol to the baselines it uses. Frontiers: we connect multimodal graph learning to AI agents, covering the multimodal graphs that agents perceive and remember and graph engineering, the practice of organizing agent workflows as explicit graphs; we then discuss open problems, concrete efforts for the community, and research directions, including when graph structure helps in the presence of strong multimodal foundation models.

Model evaluations & benchmarksRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.LG·News

One Table, Many Queries: Benchmarking Generalist Tabular Models Across Generation, Imputation, and Prediction

arXiv:2611.13001v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generation, imputation, and prediction query different aspects of the same tabular distribution, but are usually evaluated separately. This leaves unclear which capabilities they share, how their training objectives interact, and whether one model can perform all three well. We introduce the One Table Benchmark (\ours{}), spanning 56 datasets, 46 registered methods, and 20 capability axes under aligned data splits and explicit task contracts. We compare task ranks on aligned support, train five backbones under all seven non-empty objective combinations on five datasets with three seeds, and contrast fixed-model profiles with specialist portfolios. Rank comparisons connect imputation and prediction through numerical recovery and dependence preservation, and link generation to both through predictive utility; distributional fidelity follows different, sometimes opposing, rankings. Objective interventions show the largest pooled gains from including the recipient's own objective. Generation has the broadest coverage of positive pooled auxiliary effects, while prediction shows potential to improve imputation and synthetic-data utility, with responses that vary across backbones. Cross-addition effects reveal that objective benefits need not add and depend on the objectives already present. Fixed-model comparisons expose corresponding utility--fidelity trade-offs: some generalists surpass specialist portfolios on utility, while fidelity continues to favor specialization. Frozen foundation models show strong prediction and numerical point imputation, together with promising synthetic-data utility, highlighting their potential across all three tasks. These findings motivate unified tabular models that share useful conditional information while improving categorical reconstruction and faithful joint sampling.

Model evaluations & benchmarksRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.DC·News

PegasusAI Studio: Legible Cyberinfrastructure and Accountable AI Agents for Scientific Workflows

arXiv:2611.13309v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI coding agents can now construct scientific workflows, but operating them on shared cyberinfrastructure (CI) raises problems that code generation does not solve. Agents need current knowledge of the workflow system and its execution sites and access to the runtime state of distributed executions, while facilities need to attribute every agent action to a user and bound it by that user's privileges. We present PegasusAI Studio, an AI-assisted science gateway built on the Pegasus and HTCondor stack. Studio makes CI legible to agents by projecting one facility-curated knowledge base into the native configuration of several coding agents, by introspecting workflow interfaces and execution sites, and by grounding diagnosis in workflow and scheduler telemetry. Agent actions operate within a trust envelope that combines federated authentication, per-user execution environments and scheduler credentials, provider-neutral model access, observability, and approval controls for state-changing actions. The same application runs as a JupyterHub-based gateway on a research cloud and as an Open OnDemand application on HPC systems. We evaluate Studio through case studies of legacy CASA weather workflow modernization, a gravitational-wave reanalysis, an EEG analysis built with an open-weight model, and an Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) M87 image reconstruction that recovered from two failed runs to a zero-failure execution. The evaluation establishes that these mechanisms operate as designed.

Model evaluations & benchmarksRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.CV·News

PhysMoE: Fast Spatial Grounding with Single-Token Coordinate Representation in Modality-Decoupled VLMs

arXiv:2611.13000v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Embodied Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are backbones for robotic planning and manipulation. However, for coordinate prediction in grounding tasks, existing architectures suffer from two distinct bottlenecks: discrete tokenization disrupts spatial continuity with high decoding latency, while standard point regression fails on multi-contact affordances and irregularly shaped targets. To resolve these challenges, we propose PhysMoE, introducing three core contributions: (1) sharing lower layers for multimodal context while routing upper layers to specialized spatial (pixel) and linguistic (text) experts by physical modality, eliminating gradient interference; (2) encoding each coordinate as a single token by reusing the visual encoder's learned positional embeddings, injecting 2D spatial priors to natively align coordinates with visual features and ease training; and (3) differentiable Signed Distance Field (SDF) supervision on pointing, accommodating affordances and irregular geometries without costly mask decoders. Compared to the base model, PhysMoE achieves a 15.7% average gain and an 8.31x throughput speedup across 9 coordinate-based grounding benchmarks (trajectory, affordance, and localization), while preserving multimodal understanding and reasoning across 11 text-based embodied benchmarks.

Copyright, privacy & ethicsRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.CL·News

SELD: Detecting Silent Evidence Loss in Context Compression beyond the Answer

arXiv:2611.12903v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Context compression is now routine for language models with long inputs, but a compressed context is useful only if it keeps the evidence for the answer. Existing checks compare the reader model's answer or its most likely words, and thus miss a frequent failure, silent evidence loss: key evidence is removed while the answer stays the same, leaving the answer unsupported and risky for other models that reuse the context. To address this challenge, we propose SELD (Silent Evidence Loss Detector), which needs no training and no labels. Its principle is that when evidence is lost, a reader model's preferences among the answers it leaves unsaid shift even if its answer does not, so comparing these preferences before and after compression reveals losses that answer checks cannot see. We also build SEL-Pairs, a benchmark of length-matched evidence and control deletions from three question-answering datasets. Quantitative and qualitative experiments with five reader models on it show that SELD consistently outperforms strong and recent baselines across compressors, compression rates and models, identifying the evidence-removing edit in 83% of matched pairs with unchanged answers, against 70% for the strongest baseline. These results show that evidence loss in compressed contexts can be detected even when the answer is unchanged.

Model evaluations & benchmarksRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.DC·News

Self-stabilization and Byzantine Tolerance for Maximal Independent Set

arXiv:2210.06116v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We analyze the impact of transient and Byzantine faults on the construction of a maximal independent set in a general network. We adapt the self-stabilizing algorithm presented by Turau for computing such a vertex set. Our algorithm is self-stabilizing and also works under the more difficult context of arbitrary Byzantine faults. Byzantine nodes can prevent nodes close to them from taking part in the independent set for an arbitrarily long time. We give boundaries to their impact by focusing on the set of all nodes excluding nodes at distance 1 or less from Byzantine nodes, and excluding some of the nodes at distance 2. As far as we know, we present the first algorithm tolerating both transient and Byzantine faults under the fair distributed daemon. We prove that this algorithm converges in $ \mathcal O(\Delta n)$ rounds w.h.p., where $n$ is the number of nodes and $\Delta$ is the maximum degree of the network. Additionally, we present a modified version of this algorithm for anonymous systems under the adversarial distributed daemon that converges in $\mathcal O(n^{2})$ moves both in expected value and with high probability.

Copyright, privacy & ethicsRead original
13:00
aarXiv cs.AI·News

SetPrint: Black-Box LLM Fingerprinting via Setwise Correspondence of Response Changes

arXiv:2611.12950v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Black-box LLM fingerprinting aims to determine whether a target model was derived from a source model when only the output responses to input queries are observable. One way to reveal this relationship is to perturb each query and observe the resulting responses of both models, yielding two corresponding sets of response variations. These sets provide two complementary sources of information: the relations among response changes within each set, and the correspondence of response changes between the two sets. Existing approaches, however, have not fully exploited both. We introduce \textbf{SetPrint}, a training-free method that jointly captures both within-set relations and between-set correspondence. SetPrint expresses each response change relative to the mean change of its own set, and then compares changes from the two models that were induced by the same perturbation. On LeaFBench, SetPrint consistently outperforms existing training-free black-box fingerprinting methods. Further analyses attribute these gains to both within-set relations and between-set correspondence.

Model releases & updatesRead original
Every update links back to its source.
STAY CURIOUS. STAY INFORMED.

Stay informed about the changes that matter.

Give your curiosity direction. Make every day of reading count.

Subscribe via RSS